PrimeSpaceWorks logoPRIMESPACEWORKSStart a brief
Case studies / Occupier | Facility
Occupier | Facility

Facility Oversight for a Distributed Office Estate

Sites: 4 · Seats: 300+ · Model: Managed oversight

Discuss a similar requirement Property Management service
CASE FILE / PROPERTY MANAGEMENTRequirement.
Hurdle.
Result.
Client identity and commercials stay confidential. This file shows the decision structure, not the price list.
Facility Oversight for a Distributed Office Estate
01 / The brief

What the client
actually needed.

Requirement. A company with four offices wanted one accountable facility layer instead of four vendors.

The hurdle. Each site had its own vendors, SLAs and cost bases: no comparability.

MANDATE

Property Management

PROFILE

Sites: 4 · Seats: 300+ · Model: Managed oversight

DISCLOSURE

Client name, building identity and commercials withheld by default.

NEXT STEP

A signed advisory brief releases the specific detail.

02 / How it was run

The strategy,
step by step.

01

Requirement mapping

Standardised SLAs and reporting across sites, then renegotiated as one portfolio.

02

Corridor and format intelligence

Standardised SLAs and reporting across sites, then renegotiated as one portfolio.

03

Option comparison

Standardised SLAs and reporting across sites, then renegotiated as one portfolio.

04

Commercial coordination

Standardised SLAs and reporting across sites, then renegotiated as one portfolio.

03 / The result

Outcome, stated
carefully.

Single dashboard, measurably lower vendor cost, and faster site-level response times.

Illustrative in structure, verified in detail. No price, building identity or client name is published. Availability and commercials must be confirmed before any commitment.